Monday, May 14, 2012






With out question this Facebook status brings out the worst in me.
Mr. dave wainscott on many occasions has tried to teach that:
      " A modern day equivalent translation" of Luke 13:32

(Lk 13:32 He replied, “Go tell that fox, ‘I will drive out demons and heal people today and tomorrow, and on the third day I will reach my goal.’)

would have to include that fox be translated as "bitch" or perhaps "son a bitch".???

Not only did I challenge him on this and say he was wrong! But, when he (wainscott) referred to a very famous teacher of the Book of Luke and said that the teacher would back him up on this translation... I ran to that teacher and asked?

"Could wainscott be correct?"

The actual cuss word does not bother me. The intent and tone of the Luke sentence is, by far, more interesting than the use of what we today reflect upon as a dirty word. Dirty words come and go but, correlation to meaning gives, by far, more content. Content is what we need when we speak of the Bible, not worthless references.  What I asked of wainscott was "what is your reference point... and why?"

Where are you going to start. How can you defend yourself?

When you tell me that fox can be a substituted with bitch; then bitch becomes inferred to be the lowest form of a woman. If, you hold children can only be honored; when conceived in marriage. 
(
MORE TO COME HERE!
                                               )
Yes, you are right.. Not only did the "famous" teacher dump on mr dave  wainscott but, left him out in the cold with no possible avenue of retreat!


When mr dave wainscott called me a liar (in open forum) and "parapharsed" said there was no way I could have gotten hold of this teacher. I gave the World his open email address (the famous teachers invites questions?.. what a concept!) and asked wainscott to verify his wrongness. He scoffed at me and continues to this day to hold on to a teaching that is wrong. The quick dirty way to justify your maddness is to do as mr dave wainscott does... rebuking with.. Oh! your the wrong one here. Rather than open discussing the different possibilities that could go with the translation.

The more you know about mr dave wainscott's teaching; you will discover that he is just a phony liar.
more on this later.

Just an update... boNO's "save Africa" charity is reportedly sucking 55+% off the top of all money sent to it.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

What is right... Wrong.

Go ahead... tell me what is correct. What is right and what is wrong.


Great, I am so happy that you were able to point it out.


Now, what do you see on the left.....? 


Is there one picture or two? Which picture is correct?


I wish there could be a picture like this, which depicts 10 or more "correct" photos.


 Now, look in the mirror and tell me how many people you see! Be honest.


One person?


Two, maybe three? What about during the night. Is there a different one that comes out then? The honest one. The fair one.. We do not want to face up to the ugly ones... The lying one.. the one with no honor...


I love this quote:


Mr. Lely, I desire you would use all your skill to paint my picture truly like me, and not flatter me at all; but remark all these roughnesses, pimples, warts, and everything as you see me, otherwise I will never pay a farthing for it.


wow, can you see it? A rough attempt for honest approach...who said it???
well, Oliver Cromwell.


I have painted myself so thoroughly; my brush is dry. My face, cracked with age, no longer can dig deeper. My warts are there... open and ready for all to see, perhaps to learn from. Gently, I touch my friends, enemy. My friends know my touch to be genuine, gentle, warm, never to mock but to help. To joke with; not laugh about. They find me laughing at my own mistakes, crying at a sad song. 


But, enough of me.. This is not about me.. but instead it is about Pastors. All Pastors...


After being on this planet sixty-four years, I have come to the thought that some Pastors should find new work. They clearly are only interested in money.


They all clearly carry an agenda on their back, pocket and seemly are intensely interested in what we/I can bring to the table in finances. 


Looking at the non-profit arena in general finds an open eye-sore that is festering fast.


In one case, I have found  that one member in a 501(c)(3)non-profit is so miss-informed that he believes that ALL the non-profit monies (in his non-profit) are going to help the needy, etc,etc. 
The facts (for his non-profit) clearly and unequivocally prove that 90% (89.29%)of the non-profit goes to the Pastor. And, depending on how you would like to run the numbers.. none of the money in his group, indeed, help anything but the Pastor.


Typical???


again, in my experience, yes. (remember my edifier/quantifier).... some!  !


again.. more to come 







Friday, January 27, 2012

just plain wrong--wainscott

I had put a letter in Caps. and had put a word in the title of the website webpage???

The word... the

the cap...   T

so it read "The Third Day Fellowship of Fresno"


I was phoned and balled out so fast as to make my head swim. Really... I mean.. REALLY!!


This man (dave Wainscott) was clearly so elitist that I almost hung up on him. He was the pastor for crying out loud. It became much worse than this as time went by..